Most professional writers don’t start their careers as English majors. Many of us have entered digital marketing and content specialization through journalism, linguistics, teaching, marketing, PR, social media, customer support or sheer curiosity. That reality doesn’t lower the bar; it raises the stakes because clients expect clean, confident copy that sounds intentional and credible every single time.
Our editorial 201 exists for that reason. Since writing conventions don’t live in dusty textbooks, they show up in real deadlines, feedback loops, peer edits and late afternoons when your brain decides to take a vacation.
This guide can be your practical manual for 2026. It covers the mistakes writers still make, why they happen and how to fix them — fast. Expect blunt advice, clear examples and zero fluff. Yep, that last sentence practised what it preached. Let’s get into it!
Subscribe to
The Content Marketer
Get weekly insights, advice and opinions about all things digital marketing.
Thanks for subscribing! Keep an eye out for a Welcome email from us shortly. If you don’t see it come through, check your spam folder and mark the email as “not spam.”
Why Should Sharp Writing Remain Your Utmost Priority?
Sharp writing protects your credibility before you ever speak to a client. Clear, confident copy signals expertise, attention to detail and respect for the reader’s time. Sloppy writing does the opposite. It introduces doubt, creates friction and distracts from otherwise strong ideas.
In 2026, readers skim aggressively and judge quickly. They don’t separate content quality from brand quality. If your writing feels careless, your strategy feels careless too.
Strong conventions keep your message focused, your tone intentional and your arguments easy to follow. When the writing works, your ideas get the attention they deserve.
Sloppy Writing: A Serious Hazard to Consistent Execution and Performance Improvements
Sloppy writing sneaks in during moments of stress, speed or self-doubt. It doesn’t announce itself. It slides quietly into drafts when you rush through the writing process, feel shaky about the subject matter or skip self-editing.
Writers also stumble on off days, during word count gymnastics, when there are vital information gaps or when they’re trying to force awkward keywords into unwilling sentences. Ignoring previous feedback creates repeat offenders.
Hands-off project managers (PMs) and uncommitted editors contribute too. Substandard copy reaches clients when peer editors and PMs rush, miss issues or decide to let the little things slide. Sometimes an editor spots a problem but cannot explain why it feels wrong or how to fix it. And the domino effect of unchecked work often leads to confidence gaps that create quality gaps.
Good writing systems reduce these risks: Slow down, re-read and question everything. Treat editing as an act of respect for the reader.
12 Conventions To Master in 2026
Strong writing comes from mastering a core set of conventions that protect clarity, consistency and credibility. These rules apply whether you write blog posts, landing pages, eBooks or client-facing strategy documents.
The Brafton-approved conventions below address the issues that derail otherwise solid copy. Some focus on sentence mechanics like agreement and parallelism. Others tackle bigger-picture problems like point of view (POV), audience alignment and unnecessary fluff. Together, they form a practical checklist you can apply during drafting and editing.
Consider this your editorial 201 in action. You don’t need to memorize grammar textbooks or channel your high school English teacher. You just need to recognize patterns and correct them consistently.
Master these 12 conventions and your writing will read as intentional, professional and trustworthy each time:
1. Point of View Switching
POV sets the relationship between your brand and your audience. Within a paragraph or section, stick to one POV unless you have a strong reason to change it.
The second person speaks directly to the reader. It feels conversational and clear. The third person creates distance and formality. It suits corporate brands and research-driven content.
A good reason to switch POV exists when you discuss external research and then relate it back to the reader.
Bad POV example: You can improve engagement when businesses use shorter sentences. They also benefit from a clearer structure.
Good POV example: Businesses improve engagement when they use shorter sentences. You see the impact immediately in readability and flow.
The difference: The first version jumps without warning. The second version signals intent.
2. Misplaced Modifiers
A misplaced modifier sits too far from the word it describes. Naturally, confusion follows.
Bad example: Running through the report, the errors appeared obvious.
The problem: Errors don’t run.
Good example: Running through the report, the editor spotted the errors immediately.
The fix: Name the subject next to the modifier.
3. Agreement
Agreement errors chip away at credibility. Readers notice what they can’t name. That’s why subjects and verbs must agree on singular or plural forms. The same rule applies to any word that qualifies the noun.
Incorrect: Every writer forgot their style guide.
Correct: Every writer forgot his or her style guide.
4. Collective Plural
Collective nouns describe groups as single units or as individual members. The context controls the verb. Note: American English usually treats collective nouns as singular. British English uses plural forms more often. Always re-check your client brief before self-editing.
Example (1): The team is launching a new campaign. vs. The team are launching a new campaign.
Example (2): The writing group is arguing about headlines. vs. The writing group are arguing about headlines.
5. Fluffy Writing
Fluffy writing wastes time by adding words without value. It pads sentences to sound important while saying nothing. Macro fluff shows up as vague statements that avoid specifics. Micro fluff hides in fillers and redundancies.
Fluffy example: In order to truly maximize results, it’s very important to carefully consider your options.
A streamlined alternative: Consider your options carefully to maximize results.
Every word in a sentence must earn its spot. If it repeats the subheading or restates the obvious, cut it!
6. Short, Direct, Punchy Sentences vs. Long-Winded Sentences
Long sentences collapse under their own weight. They often include run-ons, redundant phrases or too many ideas fighting for attention. If a sentence spans more than two lines, split it or bullet it.
Example of a problem sentence: When teams fail to prioritize clarity during the writing process, which often happens under tight deadlines and competing demands, the final output tends to suffer in ways that impact both engagement and performance metrics.
Preferred alternative: Teams often sacrifice clarity under tight deadlines. Engagement and performance suffer as a result.
7. Unclear Pronoun References
Pronouns need clear antecedents; use them carefully. Without pronouns, readers have to do a lot of guesswork. Common offenders include it, they, that and which.
Bad example: Marketing met with sales before they launched the campaign.
The reader’s lingering question: Who launched the campaign?
Good example: The marketing and sales departments met before the marketing team launched the campaign.
8. Speaking to the End User vs. the B2B Reader
B2B2C content creates identity confusion. Writers may relate to the consumer but forget the actual audience. Relatable topics increase the risk of speaking to the wrong target. Always picture the real decision maker, not yourself.
Bad example: You want a faster checkout experience and better customer support.
The issue: This sentence speaks to the shopper, not the business buyer.
Good example: Your customers want a faster checkout experience and better support.
9. Passive Voice
Passive voice hides responsibility and weakens clarity.
Passive example: The strategy was approved by leadership.
Active version: Leadership approved the strategy.
Fun tip: If you can add “by zombies” to the end of the sentence and it still makes sense, it’s best to rewrite it.
10. Parallelism
Parallel structure keeps lists readable and professional, and matters in bullets, sentences and subheads. Therefore, consistency signals control.
Incorrect: The campaign aims to increase traffic, improving conversions and brand awareness.
Correct: The campaign aims to increase traffic, improve conversions and build brand awareness.
11. Questions in Headings
Questions in headings create expectations. Answer them immediately.
Bad question heading: What Makes a Strong Content Strategy?
The reader’s lingering question: Well, uhm, Idk. You’re going to tell me, right?
Good question approach: What Makes a Strong Content Strategy? How Clear Goals, Audience Needs and Distribution Shape Outcomes
Pro tip: Avoid opening the body with another question.
12. The AP Style Title Case
Brafton prefers the AP Style title case for blog headings. This approach capitalizes major words without overdoing it. It supports readability and consistency across content. Follow it unless a client specifies otherwise.
Quick test: Can you pick up the AP style in convention 11 above?
A Quick Word on Things Doing Things They Can’t (or Shouldn’t) Do
Inanimate objects should not perform human actions. Missing subjects and passive structures often cause this issue. Fix the subject to fix the sentence.
Bad example: The report argues that budget constraints caused delays.
The misrepresentation: Reports don’t argue. People do.
Improved version: The report reveals that budget constraints caused delays.
Write Like It Matters — Because It Does
Busy readers don’t owe you their attention; strong writing earns it. Every sentence should contribute to clarity, credibility and trust. Ask “So what?” after every point. If the answer feels weak, revise.
Precision writing shows respect for your reader’s time, reinforces brand authority and makes collaboration smoother across teams. Writers should aim for clear, disciplined writing to reduce friction, prevent tiresome revisions and elevate every deliverable.
That’s what professional writing delivers consistently, regardless of format or deadline. Apply these game-changing conventions and your work will stand up to editing scrutiny, tight turnarounds and ever-sceptical audiences.
